Rhetoric in The Crucible

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Rhetoric in The Crucible. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Rhetoric in The Crucible paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Rhetoric in The Crucible, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Rhetoric in The Crucible paper at affordable prices!

Rhetoric is the art of using language effectively and persuasively. It is also called oratory, the art of public speaking. In Arthur Millers play, The Crucible, several characters use rhetoric to convince other individuals tobelieve what is being told to them. One character, Deputy Governor Danforth who was a special judge that came to this town to help in thewitchcraft trials that were brought about by a group of girls that were accusing people that they did not like.

Danforth was very dedicated to removing all witches, he was strong on his principles and would not allow anyone to tamper with hisauthority. Danforth has condemned many people to death because ofhis belief in witches. He puts words into the mouths of the people he is questioning, this is rhetoric; he uses his passion againstwitches to persuade others into saying what he wants them to. On page 100, he says to the court," …I hope you forgive me. I have been thirty-two year at the bar, sir, and I should be confounded were I calledupon to defend these people. Let you consider, now. And I bid you all do likewise. In an ordinary crime, how does one defend the accused?One calls up witnesses to prove his innocence. But witchcraft is ipso facto,on its face and by its nature, an invisible crime, is it not? Therefore,who may possibly be witness to it? The witch and the victim. None other. Now we cannot hope the witch will accuse herself; granted? Therefore,we must rely upon her victimsand they do testify, the children certainly do testify. As for the witches, none will deny that we are most eager forall their confessions. Therefore what is left for a lawyer to bring out?I think I have made my point. Have I not?"

This passage clearly shows Danforth using his oratory skills. His logicis that if someone commits a crime, they usually wont accusethemselves, therefore the witnesses and victims of this crime are the only way to prove the person innocent or guilty. In Danforths view, if there are victims and witnesses, then there must have been acrime committed. His speech logically makes sense and often hiswords sway the opinions of people who are not completely strong on their own opinion.

When Danforth questions Mary Warren, he uses his powerfulforce to try to get her to say anything along the lines that the witches here are not a lie. He realizes that if it is true that the girls have been pretending the whole time, it will mean that he has been duped and so has his entire court. On page 101, Danforth says to Mary Warren, "… Do you know that god damns all liars? She cannot speak. Or is it now that you lie." He is suggesting that because she did not answerhim right away that she is a liar, and that she will be damned my God. As a young girl, Mary Warren most likely is scared by this, and is now more likely to say what Danforth wants, because in someway he has shown her that God will punish her for lying either about the witches or about lying about the witches.

The majority of people in this small town have a strong belief in Godand their religion. Danforth plays with this information and uses it to effectively persuade his audience. He is much respected and holds apowerful position. Danforth considers the amount of people that he has condemned as a reason for his power. He is right, people believe him, because they think that he has been right in the past. He has obviously always been a great speaker, talented with rhetoric and publicspeakingcharacteristics.

Please note that this sample paper on Rhetoric in The Crucible is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Rhetoric in The Crucible, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Rhetoric in The Crucible will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Anatoli Boukreev's Heroic Actions

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Anatoli Boukreev's Heroic Actions. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Anatoli Boukreev's Heroic Actions paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Anatoli Boukreev's Heroic Actions, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Anatoli Boukreev's Heroic Actions paper at affordable prices!

Alisha Boisvert

Essay #7

English 101

11/18/0

Order custom research paper on Anatoli Boukreev's Heroic Actions

Anatoli Boukreevs Heroic Actions

On May 10, 16, many climbers were stuck on top of Mt. Everest in what is looked at as the "deadliest season in Everest history" (Krakauer back cover). People could not get down because the storm was so fierce. Anatoli Boukreev, a Russian guide on Scott Fischers Mountain Madness team, made many rescues which Galen Rowell, a mountain photographer, described as some "of the most amazing rescues in mountaineering history" (Lalime ). Boukreev, co-author of The Climb, has climbed many mountains including "four 8000 meter peeks in 80 days" (Mountain Zone 1). This achievement shows that Boukreev has had a lot of experience with climbing. In May of 16 Boukreev was climbing Everest as a guide. On May 10 the group of climbers on Everest reached the summit and started their trek back down. Boukreev left the summit before the rest of his group and made it down to Camp IV, which many people see as being an inappropriate action for a guide because a guide is supposed to stay with the climbers to help them when it is needed. Later that day as the climbers were making their way down, a huge storm hit and made it difficult to descend. Climbers were stuck on the mountain, and their oxygen was running out. Boukreev made four extreme attempts to save people including his own leader, Fischer. Even though Boukreev saved three lives that day, his actions were looked down upon by others. Boukreev's rescues were very heroic and he was right in coming down the mountain ahead of his clients because he was the only one who had enough strength to climb back up and save them.

Boukreevs decision to descend ahead of his clients was well thought out, it was not just a spur of the moment thing. Before ascending to the summit of Mt. Everest Boukreev had had a talk with Fischer about descending ahead of the clients in order to "set up camp and prepare tea and oxygen for the descending climbers" (Lalime ). Fischers publicist, Jane Bromet, had also announced that it was Fischers plan for Boukreev to descend ahead of the clients (Lalime ). It had been agreed upon that this was the right thing to do so that if the clients needed anything, such as oxygen, Boukreev would be there to help. Critics such as Jon Krakauer, a climber who was also climbing Everest on May 10, feel that Boukreev was wrong in going down the mountain ahead of his clients. Krakauer called Boukreevs actions "extremely questionable behavior for a guide" (Boukreev and DeWalt 1). Krakauer also thought that Boukreev just decided to go back down early so that he could rest. Krakauer failed to note that Boukreev had in fact discussed this plan with Fischer. So he had not just decided last minute to descend because he was tired and needed rest, he descended because that was the plan.

Boukreev and Fischers plan worked because once the storm hit Boukreevs assistance was needed. Boukreev had a feeling that if he had stayed on the mountain with the clients than he would not have been able to help when it was needed. Boukreev states this clearly when he says

I had no clear idea that the weather was a potential problem until I was well on the mountain. My concern, as was Scotts, was that the climbers oxygen supplies were going to run out. I did the job Scott wanted me to do. If I had been farther up the mountain when the full force of the storm hit, I think it is likely I would have died with the clients. I honestly do. I am not a superman. In that weather, we all could possibly have died.(Boukreev and DeWalt 1).

Critics may say that if Boukreev had been on the mountain leading the clients than he would have been there in the first place to offer his help and lead them in the right direction. However, Boukreev knew that if he had gone down any later he would have died. If he had gone down any later than there would have been no one left to save the clients because Boukreev was the only one who was there that could help.

Boukreev knew that if he descended rapidly, like planned, then he would have enough strength to go back up and supply the climbers with oxygen and hot tea (Boukreev and DeWalt 154). This plan worked because when the people were in danger Boukreev was the only one strong enough to go back up and help. He mentions how when he asked the people who were at camp, such as the members on Rob Hall's expedition team, they "were either asleep, unable or unwilling to lend support" (Boukreev and DeWalt 188). There would have been no one around to save the clients who were in need of help if Boukreev hadnt descended ahead of the group. Everyone was weak from climbing through the storm but Boukreev was the only one who had enough strength to climb.

Boukreev was there in the time of need. Boukreev didnt just go up once that day in attempt to save people, he went up four times, the fourth attempt being for Fischer. He was unable to save Fischers life but he managed to save three others that day; Charlotte Fox, Tim Madsen, and Sandy Hill Pittman, all of whom were on Fischers team. If Boukreev had been on up the mountain with the rest of his team he might have died, but because he and Fischer had planned for him to descend ahead he was there when the clients needed him the most, and that makes his actions honorable.

Works Cited

"Anatoli Boukreevs Climbing History." The Mountain Zone. http//www.mountainzone.com/climbing/boukreev/resume.html

Boukreev, Anatoli, and Weston G. DeWalt. The Climb. New York St. Martins Griffin, 1.

Krakauer, Jon. Into Thin Air. New York Anchor Books, 1.

Lalime, Suzette. "Remembering An Everest Hero." Wander Lust. 000. http//www.archive.salon.com/wlust/feature/18/01/16featureb.html

Please note that this sample paper on Anatoli Boukreev's Heroic Actions is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Anatoli Boukreev's Heroic Actions, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Anatoli Boukreev's Heroic Actions will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Don't know

If you order your cheap custom paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on don't know. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality don't know paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in don't know, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your don't know paper at affordable prices cheap custom writing service!

In Sophocles "Antigone", Creon, the king in the story, condemns a young girl for attempting to give her brother, who was an enemy of the King, a proper burial. Throughout the story, Creons excessive pride blinds him from preventing his downfall and the suicidal death of his wife and son. With that and many other instanceshe becomes the tragic hero.

Creons desire to display his power keeps him from seeing and considering the view points other than his own. Creon initially asserts that he is equal to the state as a whole when he says on page 687 and line107, "The State is the King". This statement conspicuously demonstrates the extent of his pride, which later transforms into haughtiness and arrogance. He considers the state to be of equal value as him, rather than being equal to an individual. The comparison he constantly makes between the state and himself allows the extremity of his pride to become evident. Eventually hubris became the cause of his down fall thus, proving one of Creons main tragic flaws within the story.

Creon not only looks down upon his people, but he also expresses tension towards them, when his god-like status is questioned. The king makes it clear that he is either of or almost of Gods level of higher authority by ordering the execution of those he finds "guilty" of his so-called "just" laws. As evident on page 687 and lines 110-11, he is pretentious, in that he expects others to believe he has the right to determine ones fate. His pride allows him to misinterpret his monarchial power as Gods. For instance, when Creon understands his method of punishing one for the "crimes" they commit, in his mindinstantly be moral and just. This illusory image he projects to the public comes to no advantage, and eventually brings about his downfall and his familys suicidal death.

Order custom research paper on don't know

Please note that this sample paper on don't know is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on don't know, we are here to assist you. Your cheap college papers on don't know will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment cheap custom writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!