Hitler

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on hitler. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality hitler paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in hitler, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your hitler paper at affordable prices!

In the 10s, after Adolf Hitler had come to power, the Nazis encouraged anti-Semitism in Germany through propaganda. Source 1 is an example of anti-Semitic propaganda used to promote the boycott of all Jewish department stores throughout Germany. The cartoon was published in the Nazi party magazine in the 10s. Therefore it is likely to be biased towards the ideology of the Nazi party and as the magazine was mainly distributed to Nazi party members, it was already 'preaching to the converted. The cartoon portrays the big Jewish businessman as a greedy octopus, with a stereotypical Jewish face, who 'eats up small German traders. Its purpose was to demonstrate the central role of the party, which was anti-semitism, and also to encourage the German population to boycott all Jewish owned department stores. However, we cannot be entirely sure whether this piece of propaganda was effective in influencing the German population or whether it had no effect at all. Although we do have evidence that suggest that the propaganda used to promote the boycott was unsuccessful as many Germans ignored it. Source agrees with this and even goes on to say that the German public 'demonstratively preferred to shop in the Jewish department stores and were 'unfriendly to the SA men on duty outside. As well as this, source also agrees that the anti-Semitic propaganda was moderately ineffective saying that the 'vast majority of the population ignore this defamation of the Jews. However, this information could be unreliable as a Nazi opposition party, the Social Democratic Party, wrote it in 1. Therefore it would be biased against the Nazis. Especially as in 15 the SDP were feeling vulnerable and also thoroughly believed that the Nazi government would collapse, allowing them to take power. Nevertheless it was a secret report and would have never been published publicly. It is doubtful that the SDP would have reported something that was false if it was to never be shown to the public. In that respect, this source may be reliable. However, source also suggests that anti-Semitic propaganda or at least the growing anti-Semitism in Germany did influence the German public. It says that there were 'enough people who were influenced by the defamation by the Jews, even becoming 'fanatical opponents of the Jews.

Both source 4 and 5 do agree that though action was taken against, a great deal of the German public were not influenced by the anti-Semitic propaganda. Source 4 is a report also written by the Social Democratic Party who were in exile at the time. Consequently the reliability of this source is questionable. How did the SDP know what was happening in Germany when they were in a different country? Other factors about the reliability of the SDP, mentioned above, also have to be taken into account. Source 4 agrees that anti-Semitic propaganda was ineffective as 'the broad mass of the people [have] not condoned the destruction. However, it does appear to largely agree that there were people who were anti-Semitic, 'nevertheless do not overlook the fact that there are people among the working class who do not defend the Jews. In source 5, an American consul describes the events of Kristallnacht, a night where a series of attacks against the Jews took place. The acts of violence and theft were hailed by the Nazi party as a 'spontaneous wave of righteous indignation against the Jews. However, the American consul refutes this. He says that the local crowds who observed the destruction were 'benumbed and 'aghast over the events of the night. Thus proving that the Nazis anti-Semitic propaganda was not having a massive effect on the German public. However, do not know whether anti-Semitic propaganda influenced the German public from this source or even whether the events of Kristallnacht were undertaken by the German population The source describes the events of Kristallnacht as 'Nazi acts suggesting that it was mainly the Nazis who instigated and carried out the violence and destruction of that night, and not the German public. The fact that this report was written by an American diplomat means that the information that he will report back to his country with has to accurate. Therefore making this source very reliable. Source 6 is a secret report prepared by the Nazi party Supreme Court after the events of Kristallnacht. The source suggests that anti-Jewish demonstrations were 'not to be prepared or organised by the Nazi party. Nevertheless the Nazis didnt discourage the demonstrations if they 'originated spontaneously. Simply put the Nazis should not appear to originate demonstrations, but in reality they should organise and carry them out. This agrees with source 5 in that it is evidence that the Nazis were the main perpetrators of the events of Kristallnacht. The Nazi party members were encouraged to carry out anti-Semitic demonstrations. Thus suggesting that the events of that night did not involve the mass majority of the German population, who therefore to a certain extent had not been influenced by Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda.

Source 6 suggests that anti-Semitic propaganda was effective. It was written by a German woman who was describing her first hand experiences in Nazi Germany, therefore making it a primary source and a highly valuable piece of evidence. She describes how it was 'preached to the German public that the Jewish spirit was 'seditious and that Jewish blood was 'corrupting. This was most likely done by the anti-Semitic propaganda the Nazi produced. She tells of how she did not think of her Jewish friends in such a way, 'I thought of only the bogey-man, 'The Jew. This was how Jewish people were portrayed in anti-Semitic propaganda. For example the Jewish businessman portrayed in source 1 has a stereotypical Jewish face, with a grotesque face and large nose. Therefore this womans beliefs at that time do suggest that the propaganda did influence some Germans. This womans views cannot be completely generalised, as its only one persons perception. However, in another respect it can be generalised, as it is consistent of what we know of German life. Nevertheless the reliability of the source has again got to be called into question. The source was written in 164, not when Hitler was in power. Some details of her account may have changed over time. She may also be re-thinking the beliefs she held at that time and feel guilty. Thus trying to put her and the German public in a better light. However, this source does agree that anti-Semitic propaganda was effective in influencing the German population.

Please note that this sample paper on hitler is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on hitler, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on hitler will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!