Philosophical Debates of The Apocrypha

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Philosophical Debates of The Apocrypha. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Philosophical Debates of The Apocrypha paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Philosophical Debates of The Apocrypha, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Philosophical Debates of The Apocrypha paper at affordable prices!

Apocrypha The 14 books of the Septuagint included in the Vulgate but considered uncanonical by Protestants because they are not part of the Hebrew Scriptures. The Roman Catholic canon accepts 11 of these books and includes them in the Douay Bible.

It is hard to understand why the same religion of Christianity has two opposite views of the ancient text, The Apocrypha. What is the theory behind this disagreement? Catholicism believes this text is scripture written by people of authority, or prophets, in between the ending Canon of the Old Testament and the beginning of the New Testament. Protestants, on the other hand, take the side of the adjective word apocryphal, which means, of questionable authorship and/or authenticity.

In 50ish BCE, the Septuagint occurred. This was the translation, of the Old Testament from Hebrew to Greek. Theologians, of all Christianity, believe that at least some of the books of The Apocrypha were translated into Greek with the Old Testament. However, Catholics believe that The Apocrypha was complete by this time and all translated along with the Old Testament; Protestants do not because The Book Of Maccabees had not been written by that time.

Order custom research paper on Philosophical Debates of The Apocrypha

Maccabees tells the historic story of why and when Hanukkah began; a story of a political and holy conflict. This did not happen until 165 BCE, a hundred years after the Septuagint. Therefore all of The Apocrypha could not have been translated the same time as the Septuagint.

"Christ left a Church to teach, govern, and sanctify in His name until the end of time. To reject that authority is to reject Christ and His Gospel. We as Catholics accept the bible as authority in matters of faith because it is Gods inspired Word. However, we cannot accept it as the only rule of faith for the following reasons it goes against the Bible, the doctrine of Solo Scriptura is not found in scripture, and it goes against history."

Protestants follow the doctrine Solo Scriptura, which claims the Bible alone is the only true authorized text in matters of Christian

faith. Catholics understand that this could not be true because of scriptural writings from the Bible. Sacred tradition is to be followed alongside Sacred Scripture ( Thess. 15,6) 44. This is excerpt from the Bible says that we are encouraged to except other holy text than just the Bible. Therefore, if Protestants believe that the Bible has the only authority to tell them what their faith should be, Thessalonians should help them understand that The Apocrypha can be Holy.

Protestants believe that the Bible is authentic, but The Apocrypha is not. They believe to have authenticity, as a holy text, the book must have proof a prophet is the author and the content must agree with revelations from God. Also, it helps if the Jews consider it holy as well.

The Apocrypha is not clear on who the authors were and if they were prophets or not. The definition of "prophet", in the Old Testament, is they cannot be wrong with their prophecy and the prophets prophecy must coincide and be consistent with Gods revelations. Protestants believe that The Apocryphas authors were not prophets; hence The Apocrypha is not to be considered a holy text.

The Jews believe that The Apocrypha is historically correct, but they still do not believe that it is holy. Protestants follow the Jews examples; therefore, they trust this as fact.

Every book of the Old Testament, besides Esther, was mentioned in the New Testament. Since The Apocrypha was written before the New Testament, the Protestants ask why it was never mentioned in the New Testament as the rest of the Holy Word.

The Protestants only trust the Bible. However, the Catholic Church is responsible for the Bible we read today because they determined which books belonged to the Bible by authenticity.

"We are obliged to yield many things the Papists (Catholics)- that they possess the Word of God which we received from them, otherwise we should have known nothing at all about it." 55

This was said by Martin Luther. He revolted from the Catholics, but still understood they edited the Bible. So, if the Protestants believe in what the Bible says, and the Catholics discovered it authenticity, then they should believe in The Apocrypha as an authentic source as well. It is contradictory for Protestants to accept the Bible and reject the authority of the Catholic Church and The Apocrypha.

Protestants and Catholics have many different traditions, interpretations, and beliefs. Its hard to believe that they both claim to be the same religion because they differ in many ways. If there is authentic proof for the Bible there must be authentic proof for The Apocrypha as well. However, since that is all personal belief, the debate of rights and wrongs of Christianity will continue between the Protestants and Catholics until the end of earth; nothing less of God giving a decree personally to the Pope and Pat Robinson, will convince otherwise.

Please note that this sample paper on Philosophical Debates of The Apocrypha is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Philosophical Debates of The Apocrypha, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Philosophical Debates of The Apocrypha will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

No White People Allowed

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on No White People Allowed. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality No White People Allowed paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in No White People Allowed, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your No White People Allowed paper at affordable prices!

No White People Allowed in Zoo Today

In the photo by Ernest Withers the first thing that jumps out at you is a sign that says no white people allowed in the zoo. Even though in most photographs of segregated times the sign is the other way around it still means the same thing that blacks werent allowed to enjoy lifes privileges as whites were. Also this particular photo is found in chapter seven called "Sense of Place". This is exactly what the photo represents about how in the 50s during segregation blacks couldnt go everywhere and do everything they wanted to do when they wanted to. To the right of that sign is another sign saying that there arent any dogs or bicycles allowed, but with this photo you kind of get the feeling that it should also say no blacks.

You dont see many people in the picture only about six, looking at the picture I have to wonder whether there just werent many people in the snapshot or there werent many people in the park that day at all. When wondering that I couldnt help but to think maybe there werent many people in the park because they didnt want to be where they werent wanted on a daily basis. Of the people that the photo does show I see a little girl that reminds me a lot of a picture I once saw of my mother when she was a little girl in the 50s or 60s. This little girl made me think of what hardships and cruelty my own mother had to go through as a child in Georgia. I look at the photograph and I see more than just the little girl I see my aunt, my grandmother, grandfather, my uncle and it Do my essay on No White People Allowed CHEAP !

Makes me look at them in many different ways than I had before. Such as hero and survivor and I think about there struggle and no matter how bad we think we have it today it could have been a lot worse. As you look at the picture and the people in it you see how they look a lot like others in photos of the 50s.Except in the other photos there arent little girls walking around in a segregated zoo, there little girls running for there lives, there arent men walking with there families there men getting blasted by full force water hoses.

The people shown in the photograph to me seem to be contempt that they even are allowed in the park today. For some reason to me they dont seem to be angry protesting type but more of the type who are happy getting what they can. Even though they had to

Get on the back of the bus to get there that day, that when they got there they couldnt drink out of the regular water fountain. It seems in the photo that the main concession stand is closed even though zoo is open. And yet with all this they still came to the zoo as if everything is alright.

Despite of the sign in front of the zoo I still see a regular zoo with Trees, signs of visiting hours, waiting lines, a concession stand, food signs, birds and people. Not black people, but people who are having a good day out at the zoo. And for enjoying themselves and having the courage to do so in such a hard time I admire them because many of us would hide and complain but they decided to enjoy life where they could enjoy it.

Please note that this sample paper on No White People Allowed is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on No White People Allowed, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on No White People Allowed will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Prejudice and Racism from The Chrysalids

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Prejudice and Racism from The Chrysalids. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Prejudice and Racism from The Chrysalids paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Prejudice and Racism from The Chrysalids, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Prejudice and Racism from The Chrysalids paper at affordable prices!

Prejudice and Racism

Racism is defined as discrimination or prejudice based on race. To be prejudice or racist it is to have an opinion or judgment to be against a certain race or person not of your own culture. This can result in large disagreements between different races. The author expresses racism in this novel through certain events, main characters, the setting and the choice of words he uses to support the theme. The protagonist, David Strorm, the differences between the Norms and the Fringes, the laws of the Waknuk society and the ways of living are all illustrations of racism. John Wyndhams novel, The Chrysalids, shows prejudice and racism throughout a major part of the novel. It shows what life is like when you do or do not respect people for their race, looks, talents, or way of life.

David Strorm, the protagonist, is not accepted in his society because he is different from the other people. He is able to communicate with a small group of friends through telepathy. He is just like all of the other people in his community until people start finding out about his ability to communicate through thought-shapes. David is a very respectful and truthful person who accepts all people for who they are because he knows what its like to be in danger and not accepted by his family, or other people that live in his community. Because David has a minor difference from the other people in his society, he does not fit in with them. David has to face a dangerous life because of the person he is, even though he cannot control his differences. Working with friends, David decides that he will find a place where he can be accepted for who he is and not be judged.

The people of the Fringes and the Norms are two different groups of people that are both racist against one other. The people of the Fringes are known to live in the 'Badlands when speaking from the Norms point of view. Just from hearing the name of their community, one is able to interpret that the Norms do not accept the people of the Fringes, or anyone that is not like themselves. This tells us that the Norms consider themselves to be perfect, or as understood through their name, normal or average. Though it sounds like the Norms are against the Fringes people, and the Fringes people do not take part in their non-acceptance; it does work both ways. The people living in the Badlands are very strict. If there is a person coming into their lands from the community of Waknuk, they are sent to the leader of the Fringes to be inspected. When they catch any Norms trespassing in their land, the Norm may be tortured or punished. They do not just let people into their community that are running away from their own. There must be reasons and proof that they truly do belong to the Fringes.

There are many rules and laws in the Waknuk society that prove that there is a large amount of racism throughout the novel. "Only the image of God is man." (Wyndham18). This quote tells us what they expect if you live in Waknuk. If you do not have the proper number of arms, legs, fingers, or toes or if you do not follow the image that is described by God, you are not known as a human being. Since there are people that look different and have different talents, abilities, or disabilities, they are not accepted or respected by the people of Waknuk. This eventually led to war because people are against others who are not exactly like them. "Blessed is the norm, and in purity our salvation." (18) This quote shows us that the people of Waknuk believe that they are perfect. Everyone in this community follows and believes in everything these quotes tell you. They all follow the same rules and religion. This is what makes them all similar and keeps them together as a community.

In the novel, The Chrysalids, the ways of living show a large amount of racism. The two races are against each other because they have differences. Their disrespect ends up with many people killed and war between the two groups. All of the Norms follow the same religion. They must all be perfect and have the same human features and nothing more, or they are not accepted by the Norms, but would be accepted by the people of the Fringes. They are punished if they are caught in Waknuk for being different than everyone else. They would be known as a deviant. The Norms and the deviants live on two different pieces of land separated by water. They do not communicate with each other because they disagree with the rules and laws of one anothers society. Because of these differences and ways of living, there are two races totally against each other and they end up at war.

The Chrysalids shows us what our life would be like if we all disrespected one another based on our looks, talents, abilities, or disabilities. Living life through prejudice and racism is exactly what the characters in the novel are doing. It is evident in this novel that people do not get along when we do not accept and respect people for who they are.

Please note that this sample paper on Prejudice and Racism from The Chrysalids is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Prejudice and Racism from The Chrysalids, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Prejudice and Racism from The Chrysalids will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!