Romantic Contrasts

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Romantic Contrasts. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Romantic Contrasts paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Romantic Contrasts, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Romantic Contrasts paper at affordable prices!

Romanticism and Classicism are two very distinct movements. Each philosophy contains many different ideas. Romanticism for example, is characterized by freedom of form and spirit. It places a strong emphasis on feeling and originality. Classicism on the other hand, is more structured and organized, holding reason, restraint, and conformity in high regard. These issues are just a scratch on the surface of these complex philosophies however, and in the following paragraphs I will try to discuss each in greater depth through a series of comparisons and contrasts.

The first pair that I have chosen is the butterfly and the spider. I feel that the spider is more romantic for several reasons. First, the butterfly is obviously pretty and the spider more sublime and awe-inspiring. The butterfly tends to be gentle, pleasurable and comforting. The spider, on the other hand, is universally portrayed as frightening. It is seen as dangerous and scheming in the way it builds its web and tricks other insects. It often spins its web near a light for it knows that insects will seek its glow and be lured to their death. A butterfly is also a herbivore, which is non-threatening. A spider sucks the blood of other insects, a trait that is dark, morbid, and mysterious. The butterfly is most often seen in the daytime, but the spider can be seen at night on its web silently awaiting its next victim. Despite the fact that I believe that the butterfly best personifies classicism, it does posses an important romantic quality. A butterflies persona is ambiguous and malleable. It is born a caterpillar and after it cocoons becomes the beautiful creature that represents joy and solace. The spider however, is rigid and fixed. It is born a spider and will die a spider.

My next pair is the pine tree and the rose bush. The rose bush is universally thought of as beautiful, symbolizing love and devotion. This would make the rose bush seem classic at first glance. After reviewing some of each plants attributes however, I decided that the rose bush is more romantic and the pine tree more classic. First, the pine tree is tall and stable, symmetrical, balanced, and harmonious. The rose bush is asymmetrical--full of angled lines and dynamic motion. A rose invokes feelings, passion, and emotion. A pine tree, although beautiful in its own way, tends not to share the universal sentiment that exists with a rose. The pine tree is also rather generic. Thousands of pines can occupy a few square miles, and there are millions of pine forests scattered all over the world. A rose bush, on the other hand, is more individualized. They must be carefully cultivated to truly thrive. The thorns of a rose bush may also be seen as dangerous. Another classic characteristic of a pine tree is that it is an evergreen. It can survive through all seasons and all types of weather. A rose bush dies in the winter, and death is a rather romantic quality.

Oprah and Jerry Springer. Could these shows be any more different? I think the most obvious romantic trait of Jerry Springer is that it not only exploits taboos, but profits by this exploitation. Jerry Springer is also rather purposeless, existing only for the entertainment of (for lack of a better word) morons. Oprah on the other hand, tends to broadcast shows with some meaning, whether it be how to keep your children safe or people sharing stories of how they changed their lives for the better. Oprah is also fairly traditional and predictable--classic traits. Jerry Springer is also rebellious and surprising. You never know what will happen next on Jerry Springer.

In the comparison between Hillary Clinton and Monica Lewinsky, I feel that Hillary is more classic and Monica the more romantic. First, Hillary protects taboos. Monica breaks and exploits them. Hillary seems ruled by her head and Monica by her heart. Hillary possesses reason, self-restraint, and a respect for authority. Monica on the other hand, cares about her feelings, passions, and emotions, and rebellion against authority. She also reinforces the impossibility of happy love. Hillary Clintons persona is fixed. She has remained the same poised individual for her eight or more years in the public eye. Even after it was revealed that her husband had an affair, she stood by him as she has during his entire political career. Monica Lewinsky is ambiguous and eccentric. One day she plays a scared girl who was taken advantage of, and the next she is a scheming femme-fatale.

In the pair television and radio, I feel that television is more romantic and radio more classic. First, radio is rather generic when compared to TV. Even though each broadcaster has a different voice, it is much easier to see individualism in the variety of programs on television. Radio is rather limited and fixed. The majority of radio programming consists of music, and the sports, news, and stories broadcast must be explained. In just a few minutes of watching TV you can see a much larger variety of programming then could ever be described on the radio. Especially in todays era of special effects. There is almost nothing you cant see on television. Radio is also rather rational and sensible on the whole. Television on the other hand, is a lot more personified. It typifies and embodies todays crazy society.

My first thought in comparing an internet chat room and a hand-written note was that the hand-written note was more classic because it is more traditional. However, that is where the classic attributes of the hand-written note ended. The internet chat room is much more generic than a note. It consists of typed print and, except for the individual screen names, everything is the same. A hand-written note is much more individualized. It allows the eccentricity and idiosyncrasies of the writer to show through. It is full of feeling, passion, and imagination. The authors own hand writing can tell a lot about them, even in a short note. If they are angry or upset, tired, excited, or joyful, these emotions will come through in the style in which the individual words are written. Hand-written notes are also a rebellion against changing technology. They show an importance for tradition and the past that a chat room just doesnt have.

Another pair that I decided to compare is a black leather jacket and a coat of endangered leopard fur. One of the reasons that I feel that the fur coat is more romantic that the leather one is because the fur coat is rather purposeless. Thousands of cattle are killed every day for food, and there is certainly no shortage of leather. Leopards on the other hand, are endangered, and there is absolutely no reason to kill one for the simple vanity of wearing its pelt. Fur in general is seen as illicit and forbidden by many people. To kill an animal for no other reason than to strip it of its fur is wasteful--especially an animal already near extinction. This is an example of the romantic portrayal of the world as complicated and unjust. Another romantic attribute of the fur is its excessive ornateness. A black leather jacket is nice, but a lot simpler than a leopard fur coat. I would hardly compare it to the extravagance or flashiness of fur.

The last comparison I chose to make is between masks and nakedness. I feel that nakedness is more romantic for several reasons. First, for millions of years it has been forbidden in civilized society. Being naked is rebellious and risqu. It is an indulgence of feeling and a freedom of form and spirit. It leaves nothing to the imagination and shows humans as natural beings, products of nature which are beautiful just as they are. Masks portray humans as social beings. Since society tells us that we must cover ourselves, we are products of the rules of our social order. Nakedness also questions authority for, at least in the United States, there are laws against indecent exposure. Covering oneself, on the other hand, is traditional and displays an exercise in restraint. It shows respect for authority and protects conventional social restrictions. Masks are also rather generic and free of prejudice for everyone looks the same.

Please note that this sample paper on Romantic Contrasts is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Romantic Contrasts, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Romantic Contrasts will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Ethics

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on ethics. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality ethics paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in ethics, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your ethics paper at affordable prices!

What are ethics? Everyone has a sense of what ethics are, but pinning it down in a clear definition is not easy. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines ethics as "a discipline dealing with good and evil and with moral duty." It includes questions like "What is the right thing to do?" "Is lying ever okay?" "Is it better to do this or that?" There are two common systems of thought regarding ethics. One is absolutism, and the other is relativism.

Cultural relativism is the belief that right and wrong vary from one society to another and from one time to another. In practice, it is the belief that what is right for one person is not necessarily right for another person. The cultural relativist observes that some things that are considered wrong today in America, such as slavery, were not always considered wrong in America and are not always considered wrong in other societies today. In Arab countries, it is considered wrong for a woman to be out in public with her head uncovered, but elsewhere in the world it is acceptable and even the norm. From this they conceive that right and wrong must be relative, and that absolute right and wrong do not exist.

Absolutism, on the other hand, believes that right and wrong are based on a truth that doesnt vary. The absolutist believes that what is right or wrong is always right or wrong whether or not a society recognizes it as such at the time. Absolutism is often founded in religious faith, believing that the truth of right and wrong comes from God, such as is found in the Ten Commandments. The absolutist views ethics much like the scientist views nature, that there is a truth out there waiting to be discovered and explained, and once explained everything else falls into place. For example, when an absolutist believes that life begins at conception, it becomes obvious to him or her that abortion is the taking of a human life and is, therefore, wrong.

These two opposing views can be seen clearly in American history.

During the founding of America, absolutists clearly held sway. The Puritans had a clearly absolutist view stemming from their firm belief in the Bible. Many of the writers of the Constitution also firmly believed in an absolute standard for right and wrong. John Adams once wrote, "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution is designed only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for any other." This view predominated in American society until fairly recently. There were several factors in the late 1800s that precipitated a change. The realization that slavery is wrong despite its seeming acceptance in the Bible, the increase in communication due to the telephone, the transcontinental railroad, and improved postal service, the introduction of Darwinism, and even the introduction of Nietsches philosophy of existentialism that claimed "God is dead," all contributed to the changing ethical climate of the time. In recent years, the predominant view has become one of cultural relativism. In American society today, it is considered unacceptable and intolerant to hold to absolutist views. Our society as a whole, tends to believe that it is wrong for a person to try to change the moral standards of someone else. All beliefs should be accepted as valid, although in trying to do so, the relativist becomes intolerant of absolutist views, which is an area where cultural relativism breaks down. The widespread propagation of anti-discrimination laws is another area that shows our societys trend toward cultural relativism. Many of those protected by recent laws were not accepted or treated fairly in the recent past.

In conclusion, the two main ethical frameworks, absolutism and relativism, have both been observed in American society. Whether these changes are considered good or bad will depend, to a large degree, on the framework of the individual. Both absolutism and relativism have been around a long time, and neither one will be disappearing any time soon. Perhaps, the collision of these two viewpoints will cause people to think about the good points of each, and find a third alternative, a new and better common ground.

Please note that this sample paper on ethics is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on ethics, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on ethics will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Positivist theory

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Positivist theory. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Positivist theory paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Positivist theory, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Positivist theory paper at affordable prices!

In this essay I will apply the positivist theory to the R. v. Williams [18]1 S.C.R. 118 case. Theory is the frame work that determines and defines the state of affairs within which certain phenomena will be analyzed, criticized and synthesized. This frame work functions as a paradigm that determines the set of legitimate questions to be asked and signifies the direction towards probable answers to these questions.

Positivism is defined by The Oxford Reference Dictionary as "the theory that laws are to be understood as social rules, valid because they are enacted by 'the sovereign or derive logically from the existing decisions, and that ideal or moral considerations (e.g., that rule is unjust) should limit the scope or operation of the law." The positivist are not concerned about the morality of law. If there was morality in the law there wouldnt be a consistent application of law. The issue is not if law can be morally evaluated or not, they are concerned about the mechanics of law. They say we dont need morality, trust who ever is elected and their morality, and government is everything because you elected them.

The natural law theory is in conflict with positivism, because in natural law theory an unjust law is not a valid law. "The essence of the natural law perspective is lex iniusta non est lex an unjust low is no law at all." If you cant detect morality in law, that means its invalid. It has a longer history then positivism. "Until the twentieth century, natural law theory was generally conceived to be based upon Christian theology or Judeo-Christian values."

Legal realism began in the U.S.A. at the beginning of the 1st Century. They argue that in order to understand the legal process the person must be aware of the political, social and economic context which law brings up and changes. They see the background of the judge will reflect to the decisions they make and to the growth of the statutory law. Legal realism provides the tools for law, for better interpretation of law. Before judging they would try to find what is behind that law and what was intended by it. Do my essay on Positivist theory CHEAP !

Critical Legal perspective arose in law schools of U.S. in late 170s. "They were simply seeking to locate those people working either at law schools or in closely related academic settings with a certain vaguely perceived, general political or cultural predisposition…" Like legal realist did in 10s this approach got the attention of law teachers and the social scientists.

Please note that this sample paper on Positivist theory is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Positivist theory, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Positivist theory will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!