A Look At Life From A Transcendentalist Perspective

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on A Look At Life From A Transcendentalist Perspective. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality A Look At Life From A Transcendentalist Perspective paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in A Look At Life From A Transcendentalist Perspective, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your A Look At Life From A Transcendentalist Perspective paper at affordable prices!

Henry David Thoreau, naturalist and transcendentalist, discusses several important subjects in the self-authored book Walden. A cardinal topic that keeps repeating in the book is that of maintaining a simpler -yet superior- existence, as this quote by Thoreau illustrates "I am convinced, both by faith and experience, that to maintain ones self on this earth is not a hardship, but a pastime, if we will live simply and wisely…" This statement is quite true and, given the provisos of living, would benefit every facet of life in some way. Indeed, Thoreaus comments in the year 00 are more applicable than ever before. In support of what he says, Thoreau makes do with only the necessaries of life and receives a precious gift, time, for a simpler being. Thus, if society were to at least take note of Thoreaus suggestions, we would all be much better off.

I am in complete accord with the philosophy of obtaining a better life simply, as life has grown complex. Since man as a whole transformed into an intelligent species, life has grown more and more challenging and perplexing. At one time it was just cavemen living in simple, however cold, adobes of rock. Then came evolution, first the making of fire, and then civilization. With this power, so came more responsibility taxes, loaning, mortgage, shopping, competition, work, sacrifice, overtime, technology and more, and all in some ways necessary to survive. In the instance of mortgage, if one buys a house, then he or she has to pay completely and consistently to pay it off or said person is quite simply out of shelter, thus not meeting all of Thoreaus requirement for living food and water, clothing, fuel, and shelter. Similarly, people doing stocks on Wall Street are heavily dependant on laptop computers and cell phones. Why is this? Life has become so fast paced and hectic that they have become necessities in order to be able to do business; strip a businessman or woman of said accessories and their fragile way of life crumbles. It is no small statement that no other species on the face of the Earth has come to rival the complexity, or hardships, of human civilization.

Then again, who really wants to be entangled in the modern definition of life? Thoreaus words are prophetical in that they are truer for todays hustle and bustle than ever before. It is ironic in ways, considering his complaints were targeted at the people of his era. Nevertheless, life is hard because it is made to be so complex and frantic. Students are pushed to excel in every subject in school, when, in theory, it is completely unnecessary for a novelist to have extensive knowledge into the workings of photosynthesis, for example. If one does not excel in his or her studies, peers and parents alike tend to look down upon them. According to Thoreau, people slave away to get the big bucks, a big house, and lots of stuff. It is safe to say that most upper class folk probably enjoy those things, but they most likely face many hardships in order to maintain their way of life. For example, it takes times to make the money to pay for the stuff; a big house requires the payment of a big mortgage; and in the end, it takes constant, nonstop work to maintain this style of living; for what? To impress the neighbors who got a Lincoln Navigator by buying a Hummer ? It is much more practical to acquire a smaller, but more cost effective vehicle; Thoreau believes you would get the last laugh in the end as the neighbors will still be paying the mortgage when you finally own your vehicle. Granted, the neighborhood will not be envious, but you will not have to work that extra week that you planned to go on a vacation on. And that is the core of Thoreaus ideology simpler is better, both in terms of resources and time.

Thoreau backed up his words by proving that one can live at a bare minimum level and still enjoy a grandiose life. While what he did may not be extravagant, Thoreau was a naturalist after all, and while there is no argument that he lived in a manner completely opposite of the wealthy, it made him happy and he received a precious gift for his sacrifice. With his forfeit of luxuries, he needed not to worry about time, for he had to work only six weeks in a year to be able to maintain his existence near Walden Pond in his log cabin. Was he a Harvard graduate? Yes. Could he have become a wealthy pencil maker by inheriting his fathers pencil factory? Yes. Simply put, none of this interested him and he sought something else, something simpler that is, being in contact with nature and working basically to maintain a life, then spending the rest of the time in enjoying life. While it is unrealistic to recreate such a polar way of life today, Thoreaus paradigms demonstrate that the extras in life can be forsaken and life can still be enjoyable. As mentioned, why do you need to impress and surpass your neighbors? Live for yourself and not for anyone else. Nevertheless, Thoreau is not forcing anyone to adhere to what he says; he is simply trying to give good advice. If you want to compete, show off, and be rich and famous, then you have the ability and the absolute right; the only thing Thoreau is saying is that the it must be taken into account that life is forfeit for the luxuries that human beings inherently envy.Custom writing service can write essays on A Look At Life From A Transcendentalist Perspective

In all, human society is stuck in the proverbial rut, forever repeating its mistakes and foolishly attempting to accomplish a so called worthy existence, not knowing that there are other, better alternatives. The fact of the matter is that Thoreau is completely accurate that living simply and wisely can better affect life. If people relinquish their lives to work in order to achieve and maintain a higher-class existence, then they must have a purpose. However, the purpose, to Thoreau is foolish and it is much better to have less, but be happy. Time is the crucial element one can reap by listening to Thoreau, and is one thing in terribly short supply in this day and age. That is not to say Thoreau is forcing anyone to do what he is suggesting and, in fact, he makes it clear that he just wants to make it known to the people that there is another way. In short, a simple equation shows the two option available to us work more to get more stuff and be unhappy, or work less, get more time and be happy.

Please note that this sample paper on A Look At Life From A Transcendentalist Perspective is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on A Look At Life From A Transcendentalist Perspective, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on A Look At Life From A Transcendentalist Perspective will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Twelve Angry Men

If you order your essay from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Twelve Angry Men. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Twelve Angry Men paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Twelve Angry Men, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Twelve Angry Men paper at affordable prices!

In Reginald Roses drama, Twelve Angry Men, twelve, unnamed male jurors are

remanded to the jury room to deliberate the guilt and death penalty sentence of a nineteen year

old, impoverished boy accused of murdering his father. This drama presents multiple themes

the idea that a super-charged environment leads to mistakes; the idea that men because of their Order College Papers on Twelve Angry Men

own agendas have no time to deliberate an issue cautiously; and the idea that men must follow

their own conscience regardless of peer pressures. However, the theme that overshadows the

others is the idea that stereotypes exist in the judicial system and because of them innocent

individuals may be sentenced to death incorrectly. In Twelve Angry Men, the jury members,

unnamed to represent people in general, make a number of statements that stereotype the

accused, thus leading to the quick and hasty decision of guilty.

Stereotypes exist everywhere; however, they are most dangerous in a courtroom when a

mans life is at stake. Whether in the 150s when this play was written or in 00, any courtroom

in the country has bias jury member deciding fates. The system is not fair. As with the jury in

Twelve Angry Men, the young mans background becomes a factor in his guilt or innocence.

For instance, Jury Eight tries to tell the other jurors that the boy "got kicked around all his life"

and that he was "living in the slums since he was nine" (56). The reaction to this idea that the

boy was poor and probably emotionally scarred led Juror Ten to respond, "Youre not going to

tell us that were supposed to believe him, knowing what he is." "You cant believe a word they

say" (56). In defense, Juror Nine responds, "Since when is dishonesty a group characteristic"

(56-57). Juror Nine was right when he said that Juror Tens comment was "very dangerous"

(57). Stereotyping the boy as a liar because he was a poor boy who came from a broken family

obviously made the entire process tainted and unfair. All poor people do not lie and all poor

people do not murder. Perhaps, however, the idea that they even talked about these stereotypes

helped to sway the initial decision of the majority.

As the story proceeds, other jurors act prejudicial toward the defendant. Juror Four tells

everyone that they are missing the point about the boy, yet while he seems sympathetic, he

states, "Were not here to go into the reasons why slums are breeding grounds for criminals; they

are." "Children who come from slum backgrounds are potential menaces to society" (540). The

irony here is that Juror Five lived in the slums, and tells the men that he "used to play in a back

yard that was filled with garbage. Maybe it still smells on me" (540). At this point, the Foreman

chimes in that "[t]heres nothing personal" (540). Sadly, if labeling a person as a criminal for

being poor is not personal, then what is?

One important factor that emerges is that Juror Four says that 'the defense counsel was

bad"(540). This leads to the idea that perhaps good counsel was not appointed for the boy,

especially since he more than likely could not afford his own high-powered attorney. While an

assumption cannot be made that Public Defenders are not good counsel, often times counsel with

poor judicial training might not be able to fight a good prosecutors attempt to trigger prejudices

and stereotypes in the minds of the jurors.

In conclusion, a number of comments made by the jury members show that prejudice worked against the accused at the beginning of the drama as the majority of men voted guilty. However, as the anger rose and the facts were debated, the jurors at least questioned their attitudes about the background of the accused. Regardless of the boys real innocence or guilt, at least he was not sentenced to death based on some prejudices among the jury members.

Please note that this sample paper on Twelve Angry Men is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Twelve Angry Men, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Twelve Angry Men will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

William Lloyd Garrison

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on William Lloyd Garrison. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality William Lloyd Garrison paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in William Lloyd Garrison, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your William Lloyd Garrison paper at affordable prices!

William Lloyd Garrison was the son of a seaman; he was born in Newburyport Massachusetts, in December 1805. Apprenticed as a printer, he became editor of the Newburyport Herald in 184. Four years later he was appointed editor of the National Philanthropist in Boston. In 188 Garrison met Benjamin Lundy, the Quaker anti-slavery editor of the Genius of Universal Emancipation. The following year he became co-editor of Lundys newspaper. One article, where Garrisons criticised a merchant involved in the slave trade, resulted in him being imprisoned for libel.

Released in June 180, Garrisons period in prison made him even more determined to bring and end to slavery. Whereas he previously shared Lundys belief in gradual emancipation, Garrison now supported immediate and complete emancipation of all slaves. After breaking with Lundy, Garrison returned to Boston where he established his own anti-slavery newspaper, the Liberator.

In the Liberator Garrison not only attacked slaveholders but the timidity, injustice and absurdity of the gradualists. The newspaper only had a circulation of ,000 but the strong opinions expressed in its columns gained Garrison a national reputation as the leader of those favouring immediate emancipation.

Custom Essays on William Lloyd Garrison

Garrisons views were particularly unpopular in the South and the state of Georgia offered $5,000 for his arrest and conviction. Garrison was highly critical of the Church for its refusal to condemn slavery. Some anti-slavery campaigners began arguing that Garrisons bitter attacks on the clergy was frightening off potential supporters.

In 18 Garrison formed the New England Anti-Slavery Society. The following year he helped organize the Anti-Slavery Society. Garrison was influenced by the ideas of Susan Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott, Lucy Stone and other feminists who joined the society. This was reflected in the content of the Liberator that now began to advocate womens suffrage, pacifism and temperance.

Some members of the Anti-Slavery Society considered the organization to be too radical. They objected to the attacks on the US Constitution and the prominent role played by women in the society. In 18, two brothers, Arthur Tappan and Lewis Tappan, left and formed a rival organization, the American and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society.

Garrison became increasingly radical and in 1854 he created controversy by publicly burning a copy of the Constitution at a Anti-Slavery rally at Framingham, Massachusetts. Although he doubted the morality of the violence used by John Brown at Harpers Ferry in 185, his newspaper controversially supported his actions.

On the outbreak of the American Civil War Garrison abandoned his previously held pacifist views and supported Abraham Lincoln and the Union Army. However, during the war, Garrison was critical of Lincoln for making the preservation of the union rather than the abolition of slavery his main objective.

After the passing of the 1th Amendment in 1865, Garrison decided to cease publication of the Liberator. Garrison spent his last fourteen years campaigning for womens suffrage, pacifism and temperance. William Lloyd Garrison died on 4th May, 187.

William Lloyd Garrison, the son of a seaman, was born in Newburyport Massachusetts, in December 1805. Apprenticed as a printer, he became editor of the Newburyport Herald in 184. Four years later he was appointed editor of the National Philanthropist in Boston.

In 188 Garrison met Benjamin Lundy, the Quaker anti-slavery editor of the Genius of Universal Emancipation. The following year he became co-editor of Lundys newspaper. One article, where Garrisons criticised a merchant involved in the slave-trade, resulted in him being imprisoned for libel.

Released in June 180, Garrisons period in prison made him even more determined to bring and end to slavery. Whereas he previously shared Lundys belief in gradual emancipation, Garrison now advocated immediate and complete emancipation of all slaves. After breaking with Lundy, Garrison returned to Boston where he established his own anti-slavery newspaper, the Liberator. The newspapers motto was Our country is the world - our countrymen are mankind (an adoption of a comment made by Thomas Paine).

In the Liberator Garrison not only attacked slave-holders but the timidity, injustice and absurdity of the gradualists. Garrison famously wrote I am in earnest - I will not equivocate - I will not excuse - I will not retreat a single inch - and I will be heard. The newspaper only had a circulation of ,000 but the strong opinions expressed in its columns gained Garrison a national reputation as the leader of those favouring immediate emancipation.

Garrisons views were particularly unpopular in the South and the state of Georgia offered $5,000 for his arrest and conviction. Garrison was highly critical of the Church for its refusal to condemn slavery. Some anti-slavery campaigners began arguing that Garrisons bitter attacks on the clergy was frightening off potential supporters.

In 18 Garrison formed the New England Anti-Slavery Society. The following year he helped organize the Anti-Slavery Society. Garrison was influenced by the ideas of Susan Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott, Lucy Stone and other feminists who joined the society. This was reflected in the content of the Liberator that now began to advocate womens suffrage, pacifism and temperance.

Some members of the Anti-Slavery Society considered the organization to be too radical. They objected to the attacks on the US Constitution and the prominent role played by women in the society. In 18, two brothers, Arthur Tappan and Lewis Tappan, left and formed a rival organization, the American and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society.

Garrison became increasingly radical and in 1854 he created controversy by publicly burning a copy of the Constitution at a Anti-Slavery rally at Framingham, Massachusetts. Although he doubted the morality of the violence used by John Brown at Harpers Ferry in 185, his newspaper controversially supported his actions.

On the outbreak of the American Civil War Garrison abandoned his previously held pacifist views and supported Abraham Lincoln and the Union Army. However, during the war, Garrison was critical of Lincoln for making the preservation of the union rather than the abolition of slavery his main objective.

After the passing of the 1th Amendment in 1865, Garrison decided to cease publication of the Liberator. Garrison spent his last fourteen years campaigning for womens suffrage, pacifism and temperance. William Lloyd Garrison died on 4th May, 187.

Please note that this sample paper on William Lloyd Garrison is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on William Lloyd Garrison, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on William Lloyd Garrison will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!