Twelve Angry Men

If you order your essay from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Twelve Angry Men. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Twelve Angry Men paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Twelve Angry Men, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Twelve Angry Men paper at affordable prices!

In Reginald Roses drama, Twelve Angry Men, twelve, unnamed male jurors are

remanded to the jury room to deliberate the guilt and death penalty sentence of a nineteen year

old, impoverished boy accused of murdering his father. This drama presents multiple themes

the idea that a super-charged environment leads to mistakes; the idea that men because of their Order College Papers on Twelve Angry Men

own agendas have no time to deliberate an issue cautiously; and the idea that men must follow

their own conscience regardless of peer pressures. However, the theme that overshadows the

others is the idea that stereotypes exist in the judicial system and because of them innocent

individuals may be sentenced to death incorrectly. In Twelve Angry Men, the jury members,

unnamed to represent people in general, make a number of statements that stereotype the

accused, thus leading to the quick and hasty decision of guilty.

Stereotypes exist everywhere; however, they are most dangerous in a courtroom when a

mans life is at stake. Whether in the 150s when this play was written or in 00, any courtroom

in the country has bias jury member deciding fates. The system is not fair. As with the jury in

Twelve Angry Men, the young mans background becomes a factor in his guilt or innocence.

For instance, Jury Eight tries to tell the other jurors that the boy "got kicked around all his life"

and that he was "living in the slums since he was nine" (56). The reaction to this idea that the

boy was poor and probably emotionally scarred led Juror Ten to respond, "Youre not going to

tell us that were supposed to believe him, knowing what he is." "You cant believe a word they

say" (56). In defense, Juror Nine responds, "Since when is dishonesty a group characteristic"

(56-57). Juror Nine was right when he said that Juror Tens comment was "very dangerous"

(57). Stereotyping the boy as a liar because he was a poor boy who came from a broken family

obviously made the entire process tainted and unfair. All poor people do not lie and all poor

people do not murder. Perhaps, however, the idea that they even talked about these stereotypes

helped to sway the initial decision of the majority.

As the story proceeds, other jurors act prejudicial toward the defendant. Juror Four tells

everyone that they are missing the point about the boy, yet while he seems sympathetic, he

states, "Were not here to go into the reasons why slums are breeding grounds for criminals; they

are." "Children who come from slum backgrounds are potential menaces to society" (540). The

irony here is that Juror Five lived in the slums, and tells the men that he "used to play in a back

yard that was filled with garbage. Maybe it still smells on me" (540). At this point, the Foreman

chimes in that "[t]heres nothing personal" (540). Sadly, if labeling a person as a criminal for

being poor is not personal, then what is?

One important factor that emerges is that Juror Four says that 'the defense counsel was

bad"(540). This leads to the idea that perhaps good counsel was not appointed for the boy,

especially since he more than likely could not afford his own high-powered attorney. While an

assumption cannot be made that Public Defenders are not good counsel, often times counsel with

poor judicial training might not be able to fight a good prosecutors attempt to trigger prejudices

and stereotypes in the minds of the jurors.

In conclusion, a number of comments made by the jury members show that prejudice worked against the accused at the beginning of the drama as the majority of men voted guilty. However, as the anger rose and the facts were debated, the jurors at least questioned their attitudes about the background of the accused. Regardless of the boys real innocence or guilt, at least he was not sentenced to death based on some prejudices among the jury members.

Please note that this sample paper on Twelve Angry Men is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Twelve Angry Men, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Twelve Angry Men will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!